Palm Springs Officials Lack Credibility

Palm Springs, California.  The Palm Springs city council enacted a new 1% sales tax ordinance during their July 20, 2011 regular meeting. The ordinance and accompanying ballot statement are intended for the upcoming November 8th ballot. If approved by a majority of those voting, Palm Springs shoppers will see an additional 1% sales tax added to their purchases. That money, estimated at $8 million annually, will be deposited into the city's general fund available for any approved expenditure.

The council and the city manager have deliberately embarked on a plan to deceive voters into believing the new sales tax will be set aside for specific city improvements. Their sample ballot statement below contains a large shopping list of expenditures voters are being led to believe will result from a favorable vote.



The ballot statement is an absolute mockery! It's duplicitous and another instance of city officials employing the first part of Abraham Lincoln's famous quote, "You can fool all the people some of the time,.....", for it's a practice that's been used with success in the past. The ballot statement content bears little relationship to what's in the actual ordinance. None of the city services and programs mentioned (police, fire, library, parks, city streets/pothole repair, etc.) appear in the eight page ordinance. Instead the following two ordinance paragraphs clearly state where money from the 1% sales tax (estimated at $200 million over 25 years) will be placed.
"(e) To provide transactions, sales, and use tax revenue to the City to be used for the general governmental purposes of the City and with any transactions, sales, and use tax revenue received being placed into the City's general fund."

"The proceeds resulting from this transactions, sales, and use tax shall be deposited into the City's general fund and become subject to the same independent annual audit requirements as other general fund revenue."
Since all money from the sales tax will be set aside for "general government purposes", why not say so in the ballot statement? Why go to great lengths to deceive voters into believing they're being asked to approve a new tax that's designated for specified city improvements? While it's true a copy of the ordinance, filled with legalese, will also appear in voting materials, few will bother reading it and most will rely on what they see in the ballot statement. So, it's the deceptive language in the ballot statement that will be used by most as the basis for a yes or no vote. Voters will be fooled into thinking they're voting for police, fire, library, parks, etc., when in reality there's no plan, no guarantee, no program and no citizen commission that will watch over how the $200 million is actually spent.

Credibility and trust are at the heart of the community discussions about the Desert Fashion Plaza (recently renamed "Museum Market Plaza"), the proposed 1% sales tax hike, and spending public funds for development of privately owned property. If city officials are unwilling to market their 1% sales tax proposal in an honest, straightforward and unequivocally forthcoming manner, then they fail the credibility and trust test. Why should voters then place their faith in officials to handle that $200 million windfall when those same officials have proved so lacking in credibility and trust?

Bond Shands
Palm Springs


 Copies of this blog are available to all who subscribe using options on this page and to
those on the Desert Politics & Elections email distribution list available by request from
politics@DesertObserver.com.

 

The Desert Observer Website

www.DesertObserver.com

 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments

  • 8/3/2011 10:22 AM florence klaasen wrote:
    WE ARE INcomPLETE AGREEMENT WITH YOU ON A
    NO VOTE ON THIS DEVIOUSLY MISGUIDED ORDINANCE.
    Reply to this
    1. 8/7/2011 1:47 PM Desert Observer wrote:
      Thanks for sharing. A new Palm Springs Taxpayers Association has formed and support will be fortcoming from that group.
      Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.